Precarious stacks of
dog-eared psychology and sociology textbooks clogged the only office window,
blocking the light and my view of the Yale quadrangle. In the gloom, a
desk-hogging assemblage of old and new monitors showed constantly changing
word- and image-clouds: the ever-updating zeitgeist as intermediated by
Pinterest, Twitter and Facebook.
Professor Gluebender finally
got a match alight, lent back in his duct-taped chair and puffed smoke at the
stained ceiling.
I hoped my jetlag
wasn’t obvious as I asked him about his research: research which looks set to
overturn current advertising thought.
“Ah yes, well, you
see, advertising planner and strategists have always tried to model the human
consumer to an easily understandable, pattern-following animal. A flock animal,
that follows a leader, for instance.”
“So you create your
advertising for that leader?”
“Exactly.” Puff. “Of
course it always turns out that leaders are only leaders when they champion
products and causes that their flock likes. Soon as they get it wrong, their
flock deserts them for someone else. So. Begs the question. If the flock has
already made up its mind, how did it do so?”
“Hence the pack
model?”
“Ah yes, the pack
model. Where every creature in the pack is constantly working to maintain or
improve its position in the pack through its likes, dislikes and
alliances. Its brand preferences,
if you will.”
“And how did that go?”
“Well, humans tend to
jump from pack to pack according to likes and dislikes, so the pack model
didn’t go too well either, of course.”
“I’ve read of the herd
model?”
“Ah.” Cough. “The herd
model. Turned out the only herd-like behaviour to be found in the human world
was amongst advertising planners.”
“What came next?”
“The swarm, of course.
With just six rules or fewer, an infinite number of creatures can co-exist in
harmony… so advertising becomes simply a matter of pressing a very few buttons
in the right way.”
“And?”
“Still works for hair
care products. That’s about it, though.”
“But now you’re onto
something new?”
“Ahem. I like to think
so. Indeed. My model assumes that you have early adopters, followers, deviants,
authorities, evangelists, dependents, influencers, critics, laggards,
bewilderds, confuseds, and the just plain uninterested.”
“Mmhm?”
“And then of course,
they all switch roles at random intervals for no particular reason.”
“And you call your
model...?”
“Flerm behaviour. For
now, anyway.”
It was a long ride
back to the airport.